Modeling the life cycle of an automotive NCM622 battery pack

Battery capacity

72.5 kWh

Pack mass

380.8 kg

Manufacture → use

China → Europe

Method & software

EF 3.1 · openLCA 2.6.2

Researcher wearing safety glasses inspecting laboratory test equipment
Case Overview

A literature-based study using HiQLCD and ecoinvent in openLCA to examine a battery pack manufactured in China and used in Europe.

Study scope

One battery pack. A lifetime of delivered energy.

This study combines published cell and pack inventories with HiQLCD’s China-specific datasets to model a 72.5 kWh automotive NCM622 traction battery manufactured in China and used in Europe. It examines environmental hotspots and background-data effects.

The scenario brings together several literature sources. It does not represent one observed industrial battery design or a measured customer product.

Functional unit1 kWh

Cumulatively delivered over the battery’s automotive service life.

What the study includes
  1. Material supplyCathode, anode, collectors & pack components
  2. ManufacturingCell production & pack assembly in China
  3. DistributionPackaging & transport to Europe
  4. UseCharging and discharging losses
  5. End of lifeCollection, disassembly & treatment in Europe

Use-phase impacts include round-trip electricity losses only. Useful traction electricity, the vehicle and charging infrastructure are excluded. The 72.5 kWh initial capacity is not the denominator of the reported results.

Data in the model

Connecting a literature inventory to background processes

Foreground

Literature & scenario

Materials, quantities, manufacturing energy and lifetime assumptions.

Background

Selected datasets

HiQLCD and ecoinvent records for the inputs and related activities.

Assessment

openLCA model

Model connections, EF 3.1 calculation and sensitivity analysis.

Model inputBackground-data choice to inspect
NCM622 cathodeMaterial composition and production route
Synthetic graphiteGraphitization process and technology mix
Copper & aluminium foilsMaterial specification and processing boundary
ElectricityProduction or use location and voltage level

These are examples of input-to-provider relationships. Model A uses a mixture of backgrounds; its inputs should not all be attributed to HiQLCD.

Environmental hotspots

Materials and electricity shape the climate result

Model A reports 0.3001 kg CO₂-eq per lifetime-delivered kWh. The largest background-provider contributions identify where data selection deserves close attention.

Selected Model A climate contributors
NCM622 cathode material37.3%
Production electricity · China12.7%
Synthetic graphite8.1%
Battery-grade aluminium foil6.0%
Electricity · Europe without Switzerland5.0%

Selected provider-level contributions, not lifecycle-stage shares; the displayed contributors do not sum to 100%.

Background comparison

The same foreground, two background configurations

Model A combines selected HiQLCD and ecoinvent providers. Model B uses ecoinvent backgrounds. Foreground quantities are held constant, while the substitutions also change technology, geography and dataset boundaries.

Climate change · kg CO₂-eq / lifetime-delivered kWh
Model A HiQLCD + ecoinvent
0.3001
Model B ecoinvent
0.3973
+0.09720

Net difference, B minus A, in kg CO₂-eq / FU. This compares modeled configurations; it is not an emissions reduction caused by purchasing data.

Why does the result change?

The synthetic-graphite provider change contributes +0.10871 kg CO₂-eq / FU. All remaining substitutions together contribute −0.01151, partly offsetting that increase. The graphite-route difference is larger than the net change.

Compare all 16 EF impact categories

FU is one lifetime-delivered kWh. Fourteen categories increase and two decrease in Model B; climate change alone does not establish overall environmental superiority.

Impact categoryModel AModel BB/A − 1Unit / FU
Climate change0.30010.3973+32.4%kg CO2-eq
Ozone depletion4.025×10-94.145×10-8+929.9%kg CFC-11-Eq
Particulate matter1.868×10-83.369×10-8+80.4%disease incidence
Ionising radiation0.036050.04511+25.1%kBq U235-Eq
Photochemical ozone formation1.059×10-31.581×10-3+49.2%kg NMVOC-Eq
Acidification2.166×10-33.595×10-3+65.9%mol H+-Eq
Terrestrial eutrophication3.368×10-35.320×10-3+58.0%mol N-Eq
Freshwater eutrophication1.313×10-41.757×10-4+33.8%kg P-Eq
Marine eutrophication3.227×10-45.129×10-4+59.0%kg N-Eq
Freshwater ecotoxicity3.1783.666+15.4%CTUe
Human toxicity, cancer1.528×10-82.627×10-10-98.3%CTUh
Human toxicity, non-cancer6.119×10-91.230×10-8+101.0%CTUh
Land use1.3161.451+10.3%dimensionless
Water use0.51610.5596+8.4%m3 world eq. deprived
Resource use, fossils4.2945.346+24.5%MJ, net calorific value
Resource use, minerals and metals2.702×10-52.450×10-5-9.3%kg Sb-Eq
Methods & limitations

Read the findings within the study’s boundaries

The main limitations are a composite pack architecture, supplementary-table transcriptions not independently verified, simplified component production and yields, generic treatment routes and missing supplier-specific data.

The study is useful for examining background choices and hotspots. Applying it to another product requires rebuilding the relevant quantities, processes, geography and lifetime assumptions.

Study environment & uncertainty
Software & method
openLCA 2.6.2 · EF 3.1 midpoint
Model A backgrounds
Lithium-battery industry pack 1.1, HiQLCD 1.5.0 and ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off
Model B backgrounds
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off
Functional unit
1 kWh cumulatively delivered over automotive service life

The 500-run Monte Carlo analysis varies selected foreground distributions in Model A, with backgrounds fixed. Its P2.5–P97.5 range is 0.2361–0.4220 kg CO₂-eq / FU. It does not validate the significance of the A/B comparison or establish a measured product’s confidence interval.

Page not included in this preview